The entrance to the Alec Reed Academy. Picture: Google Streetview
April 15, 2026
A teacher at a school in Northolt has been allowed to continue her career in education after she was found to have been gossiping with a student on WhatsApp. Although the interactions were highly unprofessional, they were not sexual or malicious in nature.
Miss Amani Choudhury was an early career teacher of religious studies at The Alec Reed Academy in Northolt. Her conversations started about schoolwork, but eventually devolved into discussing school gossip.
Miss Choudhury went as far as to instruct the pupil to “block and delete” the chats when she feared being investigated. She was also sanctioned over her failure to report a safeguarding incident involving a colleague giving a student a lift.
The first messages in October 2023, only a month into her employment, were related to Pupil N missing a mock examination. Messages also included checking if the pupil was okay after an absence and sending links to homework.
The pupil stated that Miss Choudhury messaged her about schoolwork such as links to homework, but that she did not have screenshots of these messages because Miss Choudhury made her delete them. She stated that on February 7, 2024, while she was on her way home, Miss Choudhury messaged her on WhatsApp accusing her of gossiping and spreading rumours about her and Pupil A.
She stated that later that afternoon, Miss Choudhury sent a further message asking her to delete her phone number and the record of their conversations, stating “head is onto me”, and that she deleted the messages because she was told to and then blocked Miss Choudhury.
In one WhatsApp message, Miss Choudhury said to the pupil: “I know you guys have issues with him but idk [I don’t know] how the comments came to light” and “He’s really annoyed and upset cuz [because] he feels like people are spreading rumours about him when it wasn’t true” and “Could you tell me who told you what he said.”
The panel also found that Miss Choudhury responded to a TikTok message after her suspension in February 2024 from Pupil A regarding a meeting. She felt that due to the nature of the specific message it was appropriate to respond, although admitted she should have blocked his account.
Miss Choudhury accepted that the screenshots of these messages contained in the bundle were messaged between herself and the pupil. On the accusation of instructing students to delete the messages, Miss Choudhury stated that her actions were not motivated by a desire to delete evidence.
She said her intention was to bring the communication to an end and to prevent any further communication, rather than to conceal or destroy evidence. The allegation was found proven in respect of asking Pupil N to delete messages.
The teacher was also reprimanded for failing to report a safeguarding incident involving a colleague. In February 2024, Miss Choudhury was a passenger in a car driven by another teacher who had given an unauthorised lift to two sixth-form pupils off school grounds.
The panel found that Miss Choudhury failed to intervene and failed to report this incident to the school’s safeguarding team, despite having access to the reporting system and knowing that travelling in a car with pupils was against the rules. The panel specifically ruled that her failure to report this safeguarding concern demonstrated a “lack of integrity” and fell significantly below the standards expected of a teacher.
She explained that the journey took her by surprise, and said that the teacher offered them a lift as they were running late for work. She claimed that she felt “uncomfortable about the situation.”
The panel acknowledged her defence that intervening or walking away would have been a “difficult situation socially and professionally, particularly given her relative inexperience and proximity in age to the pupils”. She argued that she had been reassured by a more experienced teacher, and her lapse in judgement was a result of being “overwhelmed by difficulties with behaviour… and the demands of her role.”
Miss Choudhury was found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct which could bring the profession into disrepute, however agreed with her defence that her actions lacked malicious intent. No teaching ban was imposed.
The Secretary of State concluded that her actions “were the result of inexperience, lack of confidence, and errors of judgment made at an early stage in her career, rather than conduct demonstrating a fundamental incompatibility with continued practice as a teacher.”
The Alec Reed Academy were contacted for comment but failed to respond by the time of publication.
Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |