Forum Topic

The consultation and the application were extremely vague, The further information non existent.  What did appear was vague at best.The total absence of Inpact assessments, safety and environmental met with a wall of  silence.Misleading and incorrect information from local councillors and that's if you actually got any sort of response.Total avoidance by the local MP - Who was implicated in this process as a councillor.No proper input or even research into local history and knowledge.Choosing to listen from non local 'experts, some of whom have agendas and others with less experience than an office junior.Unwilling to accept genuine concerns.Yet this scheme was rolled out in record time with not so much as a notice on the scale or magnitude  of works.  Just fluffy and misleading posters as an afterthought.Now it's unravelling but there are still unverifiable facts and details. If there were a flood risk of such severity, every potentially homeowner would and should know and it would be on surveys and insurance premiums.They do not even refer to whether this is existing dwellings or planned future developments not disclosed. Or indeed where?This is really a do it on the cheap back door deal.  Suits Thames Water, the council and potential developer partners.These should have been sub surface installations and the requirement , function and real purpose fully explained and notified and presented to the local populace, especially as it renders a large part of a key park seriously compromised for safe recreational use for all people of all ages.What is needed is a full independent investigation into the whole debacle and the truth fully laid bare.Won't happen until all the players are long away.

Raymond Havelock ● 271d

Sadly it seems that agenda's of certain people and moderators is at play on local SM groups.Numerous posts on Hanwell, South Ealing and Northfields Friends have been and are being deleted where they question the reasons behind the SUDS Swamp creation.Those, mainly fake, posts lauding this fallacy are however left despite nobody having cold hard facts backing up the positivity of SUDS.I walked through Lammas Swamp on Wednesday and the SW drain at the Elers Road entrance clearly backing up despite us not having any rain for a good few days (which is a miracle in itself). So is this to do with local flooding "risk" or actually TW and Ealing adding flow capacity so they can justify building loads of flats that we don't need? You decide.This scheme is an utter, utter disaster.As we, at long last, enter a period of good weather just wait to see the further destruction of Lammas.The amount of useable open land is now minimal and you can already see how threadbare the rest of the grass is becoming through stress of increased use. Just wait until we have a long hot and dry period. These will become a dust bowl rapid.Grass is extremely resilient but like everything it has it's limits. You can't fit 100% of use into 30% of previous capacity and expect no negative effects.Will they cry ecological disaster when this happens or will the moon howlers instead say it's due to that old chestnut of climate change and no wonder it's happening due to the big orange blob in the sky being as bright as their JSO paint?Again.... you decide

Colin Goodman ● 282d