Forum Topics

CYLCING IN EALING'S PARKS - 2

CONFUSED OF EALINGHaving posted the original article on this topic I have become more conscious of the signing in Pitshanger Park. IT IS CONFUSING TO SAY THE LEAST!There is one solitary NO CYCLING sign in Pitshanger Park which stands between the bowling green and the tennis courts, facing towards the bowling green. This sign would imply that cycling is prohibited in the whole of the Eastern end of Pitshanger Park, which includes the children’s playground and the children’s play centre. HOWEVER, that area can be accessed by another path on the other side of the tennis courts, and from the park entrance opposite Barnfield Road where there aren’t any NO CYCLING signs. If Ealing Council rescinded its anti-cycling by-laws in 2006, as Anne Reddy suggested, perhaps this solitary sign is a forgotten relic of an earlier era. QUESTION: is cycling in this area allowed or not? ASK EALING COUNCIL!Then there is the footpath running from the bowling green to the Millet Arms past St Mary’s Church Perivale. At the entrance to the path there are overlapping anti-cycling barriers and a green finger sign (partly defaced) which reads “FOOTPATH LEADING TO PERIVALE” Underneath the green sign is blue finger sign pointing away from the footpath and past the bowling green towards Argyle Road which reads PERIVALE ½ followed by the image of a cycle which implies that cyclists should go that way. BUT a few metres down the footpath towards the Millet Arms there is a fairly new blue sign indicating a SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH. At the other end of the footpath there are similar anti-cycling barriers before the bridge over the Brent, and another blue SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH sign indicating it is OK to cycle from there to the Millet Arms exit. Entering path from the Millet Arms end there is a blue SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH sign by the Lych Gate, and on the opposite side of the road is a blue finger sign with a cycle image on it indicating WEST EALING 1½. SO, on balance one might conclude that the footpath between the bowling green and the Millet Arms is a SHARED PATH. On other footpaths from the allotments area and from Argyle Road linking with the ‘SHARED’ footpath at the bridge over the Brent there are no shared pedestrian/cycling signs. QUESTION; Does the presence of the SHARED PATH signs on the ‘footpath’ between the bowling green and the Millet Arms and the absence of shared path signs elsewhere indicate that cycling on other footpaths in Pitshanger Park is NOT ALLOWED? ASK EALING COUNCIL!Looking at the other access points into Pitshanger Park from Argyle Road and Scotch Common there are no SHARED PATH signs anywhere. HOWEVER, at the entrance by the Argyle Road/Scotch Common roundabout there is a green finger sign pointing into the park saying PUBLIC FOOTPATH. On Scotch Common there are two signs – a green finger sign saying PUBLIC FOOTPATH pointing towards the park entrance opposite Kent Avenue, and where that footpath starts is a blue finger sign with a cycle image on it saying PERIVALE ¾. QUESTION: Is there one rule for cycling on the footpaths in Ealing’s open parks and another for cycling on enclosed footpaths like those in Pitshanger Park. ASK EALING COUNCIL!SO, whilst the law against pavement cycling alongside the highways is absolutely clear, but un-signposted, the local by-laws created and enforced by Ealing Council are totally unclear and the signposting is contradictory. CYCLISTS SHOULD ASK EALING COUNCIL TO EXPLAIN THE LOCAL BY-LAWS CLEARLY IN THEIR CYCLING PROMOTION LITERATURE, AND MAKE THEIR OFF-HIGHWAY SIGNAGE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE BY-LAWS!

Tony Purton ● 4692d1 Comments ● 4691d

CYCLING IN EALING'S PARKS

Re ‘Rude people towards cyclists in Lammas Park’ - posted 02/11/2013. CYCLISTS HAVE NO ‘RIGHT’ TO CYCLE ON FOOTPATHS AWAY FROM THE ROAD, but only commit an offence where local by-laws or traffic regulation orders create such an offence. It is the responsibility of every cyclist to ensure that he/she can ride legitimately and safely on any paths which are not part of the public carriageway. The ONLY place cyclists have an unassailable legal right to ride is ON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY – NOT on the pavement (footpath), unless signposted for shared use, but ON THE ROADWAY (carriageway). REF: The Official Highway Code 2007 Edition ‘Rules for Cyclists’ pages 21-26.SEE EARLIER POSTS: PAVEMENT CYCLING/IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING  – 15/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 22/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS 2 – 26/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS 3 – 26/10/2013While encouraging cycling, Ealing Council fail to include in their promotional material information on where cyclists can (and cannot) legally ride so that cyclists can be sure of their ‘rights’, and so that walkers can be aware that they are expected to share space with cyclists – while emphasising that cyclists must give priority to pedestrians. Why not ask for clarification. CONTACT EALING COUNCIL:- Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell - ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk; Cabinet Member for Transport and Environment Bassam Mahfouz - Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk    Cleveland Ward Councillors: Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk ; John.popham@ealing.gov.uk; Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukThe following extracts from the reference websites set out the issues.https://www.gov.uk/local-government-legislation-byelaws - Cycling in parks etc is subject to by-laws made by local councils …..  under an enabling power established by an Act of Parliament. Since by-laws create criminal offences, they cannot come into effect unless they have been confirmed by a Secretary of State http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2011/jul/28/cycling-pavement-offence  - The basic [1835 Highways Act] pavement cycling offence …..  does not apply on paths which are "away from the road" - for example in alleyways or in parks. Whether cycling is allowed is likely to depend on local considerations. In some cases there may be local by-laws prohibiting cycling - it's a good idea to watch out for these especially in parks and in pedestrianised areas.Local Government minister [Eric Pickles] announced [in July 2011] that councils no longer have to receive permission from Whitehall to remove restrictive by-laws. The initiative is part of a government effort to remove the red-tape facing many councils and to devolve decision-making to local communities. [Whether Ealing Council rescinded all its anti-cycling by-laws five years earlier in 2006, as suggested by Anne Reddy, is difficult to verify on Ealing Council’s website.]http://www.bikehub.co.uk/featured-articles/cycling-and-the-law/ - Cyclists have no right to cycle on footpaths “away from the road” but only commit an offence where local by-laws or traffic regulation orders create such an offence. If no local by-law signage is apparent, the local authority may (or may not) explicitly allow cycling in pedestrian zones. …. cyclists must give priority to pedestrians and must take the utmost care in areas where pedestrians hold sway. According to the Department for Transport’s Code of Conduct, cyclists need to weigh up whether there’s a critical mass of pedestrians: “In pedestrianised areas, only ride your cycle if there aren’t too many pedestrians about; otherwise dismount and push it.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towpath - Not all towpaths are suitable for use by cyclists, but where they are, and the canal is owned by British Waterways, a permit is required. There is no charge for a permit, but it acts as an opportunity to inform cyclists about safe and unsafe areas to cycle. Some areas including London are exempt from this policy, but are covered instead by the London Towpath Code of Conduct. There is also a Two Tings policy in place, requiring bikes used on a towpath to be fitted with a bell, which should be rung twice when approaching pedestrians. Parts of some towpaths have been incorporated into the National Cycle Network, and in most cases this has resulted in the surface being improved.[11]http://www.nationaltrail.co.uk/thamespath/downloads.asp?PageId=106 - The Thames Path National Trail is not a long distance route for cyclists: Most of the Thames Path is a public footpath on which cyclists have no legal right to ride unless they have permission from the landowners - cycling without permission is a trespass offence against landowners.  http://www.royalparks.org.uk/about/cycling.cfm[Cycling in Royal Parks is now encouraged although in some places restricted.]

Tony Purton ● 4702d7 Comments ● 4692d