Forum Topic

Personally I don't think the present council give a monkey about what people think, it's more a case of how much money they can get in from the rates and yet they make a right shambles of obtaining money from other sources.From the EALINGTODAY.CO.UK front page."Lib Dems accuse Ealing of being 'chaotic' in dealing with Section 106 fundingLib Dem Councillors have accused Ealing's administration of being 'chaotic' in the they are dealing with Section 106 money - cash paid by property developers to the Council to be spent on local improvements. Over a year ago, Cllr Gary Malcolm pointed out that the Council gained from developers only a quarter of what other London councils did – this is 'free money' from developers that residents of Ealing are not getting because the Conservative-led Council are not negotiating hard enough. Ealing's Cabinet agreed in October 2006 to create an additional post specifically to negotiate these agreements with developers, and staff worked out that this extra officer should bring in between £500,000 and £1 million in additional Section 106 funding per year. At the Scrutiny meeting, Cllr Jon Ball asked whether the new Section 106 officer had been appointed and was amazed to find that officers did not know. Cllr Ball pointed out to the Leader of the Council that if this post has not been filled, around half a million pounds of potential S106 money have "slipped through the Council's fingers." A report will be made to a future Overview and Scrutiny meeting.Papers discussed at the meeting also reveal that over £11 million of Section 106 from previous agreements dating back for years is sitting in Council bank accounts instead of being used to improve the Borough. Councillor Gary Malcolm said: "It is disgraceful that the Council has been so poor at getting money from developers whose developments are causing environmental and transport problems. Also it is unacceptable that the Council has not spent the money it has received to reduce problems caused by developments." He added: "If this officer has not been appointed, the resulting loss of half a million pounds is a scandal. It exposes the Conservatives' promises of value for money as hollow rhetoric."  August 24, 2007"

Peter Wright ● 6947d

It was a packed meeting at the town hall tonight in which Glenkerrin gave a slide presentation and talk with a reply by SEC followed by questioning from the floor. It was properly chaired by Patrick Chapman and even though the vast majority were against the development in its current form there was a generous round of applause given to the visitors for facing the residents. Community groups making up SEC include:-Ascott Avenue Residents AssociationBoston Manor Residents AssociationBrentham SocietyCentral Ealing Residents AssociationChiswick Protection GroupCreffield Road Residents AssociationEaling Civic SocietyEaling Fields Residents AssociationFriends of the EarthGordon Road & Surrounding Streets GRASSGrange Grove Residents AssociationHanger Hill Residents AssociationKingsdown Residents AssociationMadeley Road Residents AssociationNeighbours PaperThe Park Community GroupPitshanger Community AssociationWalpole Residents AssociationWarwick Road Residents AssociationWest Ealing NeighboursWoodfield Gardens Residents AssociationResidents objecting should send a letter to Gerard McCarten, Planning Officer, Ealing Council, Percival House 14-16, Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 2HL  or email to Planning@ealing.gov.uk attention Gerard McCarten.Quote Ref P/2007/4246 Arcadia Centre Redevelopment and give your name and address.Also send copies to your three ward councillors at Ealing Town Hall. Find out who they are on www.tinyurl.com/27jykoFor more information on the current proposals and for reasons to object please access www.saveealingscentre.com

Robert Darke ● 6883d

Yes Robert, it was a packed meeting last night, but a very interesting one. I'm glad I attended. And I agree it was properly conducted by Mr Patrick Chapman(Chairman of Walpole Residents' Assoc) who should be congratulated on his excellent chairmanship skills – but for his sensitive and firm handling of the meeting, it might have developed into a chaotic ranting session. Had it done so, I for one would have walked out of the vastly overcrowded, stuffy and uncomfortable room. Thanks and congrats also to Mr Sean O'Gorman(spelling?) from Glenkerrin for his very useful presentation. It was so unfair to see him alone, pitted against a vast array of noisy protesting residents, but he should take comfort, as there is a larger than imagined groundswell of more or less silent people, who in general terms support what Glenkerrin have proposed.I note that you call for local residents who object to the Glenkerrin proposals to send letters to Mr McCarten, the Planning Officer at Ealing Council. It would also be fair, don't you think, to include a call to those silent(in the main) residents who generally like the proposals, to similarly write to Ealing Council stating their support, opinions, queries and worries about the plans. Fair's fair Robert!You've probably gathered that I find some merit in a lot of the work that Glenkerrin have done thus far. The proposals aren't perfect, but there are great and exciting possibilities, which I hope can be developed even more to the advantage of our beloved town centre. I look forward to a regenerated Ealing. 

Gerry Tan ● 6882d

The Arcadia plans are interesting, and probably a move in the right direction - using the space above the tracks, for example, but they don't seem to have been really thought through fully, and could do a great deal more environmentally.The Leaf is a fairly nice looking building, suitably modern, but it is too tall for the site - although if I were the developer I would submit plans for more than I wanted so that any compromise would still give me what I did want (perhaps that is what Glenkerrin has done ... ).One problem is that, taken as a whole, the plans lack cohesion. The three buildings alongside The Leaf overlooking Haven Green are unimaginative and don't fit the scale of The Leaf (or it they...). It would have been better if they got Foster and Co to come up with a whole frontage, perhaps with a smaller main building, and bigger companion blocks.The other thing that really should be looked at again is how environmentally friendly the whole development is. What about green roofs and wind turbines on the top of the highest blocks (the two on the roof of the former? university building on Uxbridge Road spin away merrily even when there is hardly a breeze at ground level). Will there be any provision for solar water heating, or even photovoltaic cells? What about rain and grey water recycling, ground source heat pumps or other new technology? It is an important site, and there is an opportunity to build something that could be so much better. In Paris there there are now some buildings with living walls (masses of soil-free lush vertical planting drip fed from the top using rain/recycled water - Google the vertical garden designer Patrick Blanc), which would be a huge improvement to a lot of buildings in Ealing :^)It might cost a small amount extra to build like this, but if the planners/council took a stand, I believe that the developers would ultimately gain by building the greenest development they could - at a time when there is something of a glut of flats in the area, the extra kudos of living in a truly green development would attract buyers who might not have even considered Ealing before.

David Fox ● 6869d

At last, the "big guns" of Ealing are going public in their support for the Leaf development. I've just read with some relief, pleasure and encouragement the statements from the Board of the Ealing Broadway Business Improvement District(BID) Company.It seems the overwhelming majority of Ealing's businesses, comprising small, medium, large and national enterprises are in favour of the Glenkerrin proposals. Indeed, we in Ealing can't get any bigger guns than the likes of dear old Marks and Spencer to side with the proposed Ealing town centre plans. Here's what they say:  "The BID Company encourages the Council to grant planning permission for this vital and exciting development and looks forward to working with the Council in pushing forward the renewal and enhancement of the town centre.""The BID Company will draw on its extensive knowledge of urban renewal around the country to ensure that the disruption to trade during the construction period will be reduced as much as possible for residents, shoppers and businesses."The M&S Ealing Manager added his support(and what seems like a little warning) by saying:"We recognise that this process of regeneration will take the best part of a decade to achieve," he said. "There is, however, no time to be lost as investors and retailers review their strategies and could decide to exit the Town Centre if conditions for successful trading are not met."Recently, we have encouraged our many friends, neighbours, a few relatives and sundry other folk, who have lived, worked schooled and played in Ealing for decades(someof us for 50 plus years!), to write to the Council Planners stating(in our own quiet way) our support in general for the Glemkerrin plans. It's heartening to see that the "big guns" are rallying round us now(albeit rather late in the day!) and that our feelings that the silent majority will have their say at last, against the relatively few noisy protesters with their strident rantings.The proposals aren't perfect, but they are encouraging and have promise – I do hope we're not going to delay and frustrate any regeneration of our beloved town centre any longer – we've watched it's decline over the last twenty plus years. We need action ASAP. Well, that's my opinion anyways.  ;-)

Gerry Tan ● 6866d

In case any forum members missed Tony Miller`s letter in last Fridays Gazette:-The Ealing Bid Company board has done its members and the general public a disservice by voting to support the Glenkerrin planning application for the Arcadia site, as disclosed by Dr.Gurd - letters Gazette Dec.28th.Local traders and businesses should be very concerned about the proposals. The PR spin by Glenkerrin, which BIDCo has swallowed, hides the fact that the scheme is a giant housing development masquerading as "regeneration".It would cram over 700 units onto a space that Ealing Council`s approved plan says is suitable for just 220, provide none of the social amenities needed to support such a high number, give less than 15 per cent of the total floor space to retail and leisure use and have no coherent retail strategy to attract shoppers.Glenkerrin says it will appeal to so-called "aspirational" rather than convenience shoppers, ie to people wanting higher value, higher quality goods.But despite what its PR girls are telling the public, there is no space for a "new department store". The largest unit will be barely half the size of the shop in the Ealing Broadway Centre quit by Beales.Closing the existing Arcadia car park will cut the number of public parking spaces by 74. This, the poor architectural style and the failure to provide an integrated public transport interchange, are more likely to drive people away than bring them in to Ealing.The Council has extended the period for comments to 25th January. It is  not too late for people, particularly anyone who wants a genuine revival of Ealing Town Centre, to urge rejection of the disastrous Glenkerrin plan.                            TONY MILLER, Ealing.

Robert Darke ● 6842d