I am quite impressed with the service which I have had at Perceval House on the very few occasions I have been there. When I visit, I do go in trepidation, because I have had so very many bad experiences with other councils. But so far so good.But 4.5 hours (I hope you timed it) is totally out of order.As I have said elsewhere all Councils jump when you do a FORMAL first stage complaint. Your rage, upset should enable your first letter to cover every point.If disatisfied with the response to this you say just that rather than waffle, and escalate to STAGE 2, and similarly with STAGE 3 and then to the Ombudsman. This is where Councils are vulnerable, and so they hate the use of the statutory process.You ask for an apology, money lost (with paperwork), money for your distress, a change of procedure or policy, restoration or whatever else.This sounds heavy, but it is not if your first letter is good. The stages mean a junior,middle and senior person in that order respond to your complaint.A council officer might well say, why not just informally complain before using the statutory procedure. It is up to you. Nowadays I fnd that charming persuasion works better than other approaches, however furious I feel. There are people to complain to instead, but the statutory route (you don't have to fill in a form) gets heads in gear. Other routes only might.However my complaint about managers refusing to come out of a meeting is a strong sign that customers come second. Many Councils suffer from this affliction. Some of us complain because that is what is so wrong about Councils. Customer service skills have been with us for how long? I would like Ealing to be the best. Come on Phil.
George Knox ● 6405d