Forum Topic

Ealing in Crisis - a Crisis of Trust

Had Tory Cllr Phil Taylor turned up on time at the SEC “Ealing in Crises” question-time he would have known that the Green Party candidate for Ealing Central and Acton Sarah Edwards, could not attend due to an illness. He would also have known that I had made a statement at the event on her behalf.In his inimitable style he chose instead, to cast her in a bad light in his blog by stating  in his opening words that she "failed to turn up"without any words of explanation. Even Labour had the decency to explain why she couldn’t make it in their comments on what Cllr Phil Taylor described as a “fantasy planning session” Cllr Phil Taylor must surely know that this sort of language and these attacks are what put people off politics. I am sure the SEC put a lot of effort into arranging this worthwhile event and then for him to question their accountability is absurd. It states on their web page that the SEC represents several Ealing resident associations. Aren’t Councillors also supposed to represent the residents of Ealing? That evening everyone searched for the “big idea” to solve Ealing’s problems but it became clear that an under-current feeling existed throughout: the lack of trust in our politicians and in local democracy. This was evident from recent events such as the Gunnersbury Park campaign which I was involved in, the Arcadia development flop, Dickens yard debacle and the Southall Biofuels plant which was overwhelmingly rejected by the council and people in Ealing and yet, against our wishes, we find it back again in the current appeal.If we elect councillors and politicians shouldn’t they listen to us? Cllr David Millican’s response to questions on the Arcadia development, which he supported, was: “we are listening”. The audience were not convinced given it was rejected as called for by residents.How do we move on from here? How can trust be rebuilt? Perhaps councillors could start by heeding residents and by challenging some of the assumptions behind development:  such as the presumption that the population growth forecasts in the local plans are inevitable, without questioning what is optimal or practical;  such as the idea that new homes are the only solution, while many properties lie empty;  such as the idea that private developers should dominate planning policy; such as the notion that consumerism and additional retail outlets are the answer to our well being;  such as the idea that developers and experts know best etcCouncillors could also open their minds to alternative ideas such as the transport inter-change at Ealing Broadway and explore ways to finance it before rejecting out of hand, such an Ealing Credit Union where our savings will stay invested within the local community like in Leeds, such as developing a local energy industry like in Woking where they have developed their own local electricity grid, such as free insulation for homes like in Kirklees, such as a new centre for repairing household items like that run by Islington council, such as retaining waste within the borough to produce energy from anerobic digestion etc. Developments such as these would create more local jobs and save money.Ealing can have a brighter future if our elected leaders take the initiative and work hand in hand with residents.C Bryan

Conrad Bryan ● 6040d10 Comments

Any of us with an element of wit knows that what Ealing's Regeneration Team is proposing is very likely to "end in tears". None of our elected representatives attended the meeting held by West Ealing Neighbours to discuss the regeneration proposals for the Green Man Lane Estate. They seem to have given up and passed responsibility to officers and developers. Some prospective councillors were there and I understand with a grasp of the problems.For the Council and the developers the key to the success of this dense mixed tenure design is that, "A huge emphasis has been placed on ensuring the mistakes of yesterday are not repeated". What this emphasis is and how it will preclude the mistakes of the past (unlisted) is evaded by the article published in Ealing's regeneration magazine launched at Mipim.I haven't lived in a flat in a large block but I know people that have (recently and in Ealing). Their stories say to me quite forcefully that the quicker we remodel regeneration on the rows of Edwardian terraces which were there before they were demolished to make way for the present Green Man Lane Estate the better. Better for safety, better for community, better for health and much easier to police.And hey a bit more room for an expanded primary school and playground wouldn't come amiss wouldn't you think?Conran, this council hasn't even tried to sell this idea of densification to us. It hasn't tried to debate it. It has treated us the electorate very badly by being so closed and secret and it will treat the new inhabitants badly to structures that don't "grow" sustainable communities and with poor or absent community facilities.

Arthur Breens ● 6027d