Forum Topics

How other boroughs do it better

The Future of the Great British Town Hall – everywhere but Ealing “There is no alternative but to talk to the representatives of the community who are actively going to participate in this [civic building] long after we as architectural practitioners have moved on to other things. The term I use? ‘Ruthlessly inclusive’” – Ivan Harbour, Senior Partner, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners Town Halls are architectural icons from an era of optimism and utopia, which aimed to give power back to local communities. Whilst the buildings still carry those founding principles, there is a perception that they have lost their connection to the community and many have fallen into disrepair.Local Authorities, but not Ealing, are increasingly finding inventive ways to reverse this decline by re-imagining town halls, re-establishing them as public assets, and often successfully placing them at the centre of local regeneration and industrial growth strategies.Ealing council have closed the local town halls in the borough leaving only Ealing. Ealing borough residents were not consulted about the future of the old Town Tall and had only a brief chance to view some boards in the Broadway Centre, the done deal for Perceval House. Unlike the boroughs in this webinar our Illustrious Leader and his cabal of nodding donkeys have no vision.  Senior council officers share responsibility, they are employed to adviseThis webinar shows what can be done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdMYHiW-Ev4&feature=emb_logo

Libby Kemp ● 2124d2 Comments ● 2119d

Something Fishy About The Brexit Negotiations

The PM is disappearing off into the attic room in 10 Downing Street just as the Brexit policy he has championed is reaching a crisis point. He is now insisting on a rigorous interpretation of the rules having been exposed to Covid-19 because he had previously been totally unbothered about adhering to them. Whether this is because he wanted sometime away from Princess Nut Nuts or was hoping to catch up with The Crown and Breaking Bad we won't find out until he publishes his memoirs but whatever the reason his competence has once again been proven sorely wanting. Bad as the pandemic is, there is good reason to believe that a no deal Brexit would have more dire consequences for this country in the longer term. By Spring we hopefully will have a vaccine but the deleterious consequences of having no proper trading agreement with our neighbours will last for decades. The two things that seem to be driving us to no deal are the UK's government insistence on state aid and the issue of fishing. I can't begin to understand why a Conservative government would deem state aid to be so important — what on earth would Mrs Thatcher think? It was her driving forward the single market that significantly reduced government support across Europe for ailing industries and made the EU much more internationally competitive. I originally thought fishing was more straightforward. Although it is a tiny industry, fair enough that this country should be able to control its own waters. However, I now learn that most fishermen or fisherpeople as we now apparently must call them, don't want to leave the EU. This is because it has started to become clear that although British trawlers will be able to catch more fish, there will be nobody to buy it. We eat a relatively small proportion of the fish caught in domestic waters and the EU bought a large amount. These exports would now be subject to tariffs. Worse still more people are employed in processing fish than there are catching them and when a non-British ship currently brings in a haul from British waters it will go to our fish processing plants which are the largest in Europe. These ships will no longer bring their catch onshore because they would then be subject to tariffs so they will be processed in facilities in the EU. Because the catch of British ships alone will not be sufficient to make up the difference, so some of the processing facilities will inevitably close leading to large scale job losses in the industry. Is there anybody who still supports Brexit who can explain to me why if, even if the only industry supposedly benefiting from all this is being harmed, why we are going down this road other than the man supposed to be at the wheel has bu**ered off just when he is needed.




Gordon Southwell ● 2128d5 Comments ● 2122d

The War for Johnson's Ear

For anyone who has had the misfortune to study Tudor court politics what is happening in Number 10 seems depressingly familiar. Weak and incapacitated leadership from the top is leading to factions vying for power. It hasn't been stated explicitly in any of the news reports I have seen on this so far but it is difficult not to conclude that the Biden election victory has set this all off. Channel 4 did some proper investigative journalism to show the extent to which former members of the very small Vote Leave team now dominate at the Cabinet Office and Number 10.  This country has already had its reputation sullied by the current government but appointing someone who is best known for dressing up as a chicken as Chief of Staff would clearly have been a step too far. Channel 4 highlighted how the current cabinet has effectively been rendered powerless by the Cummings cliques grip on power so it has been left to the only apparent adult left in the room, Carrie Symonds, to act. The only possible argument for a no deal Brexit was that it would allow a transformative deal with the US which would partially compensate for the economic damage done. Biden may have called Johnson before other European leaders but it wasn't a sign of favour but to issue a warning about the Internal Market Bill and the Good Friday Agreement. Johnson has been told that if he continues on this path he will be very much on his on and it will be no deal with the US as well as with Europe which would be an economic disaster several levels up from what would have happened if we left without a deal under Trump. Today it looks alarmingly like a hostage situation is developing in Downing Street with Cummings and David Frost threatening to resign if Johnson doesn't stick to their programme. He may be tempted to give into their demands because a u-turn now would mean he would have to go back on all the pledges he made  after being elected.  However, there is some cause for optimism because it is hard to thing of a pledge that Johnson hasn't gone back on and there are signs that even a cabinet handpicked for their loyalty to Brexit are increasingly realising the current path is the one to national ruination. That said, if Cummings isn't out by the end of today I think it will be a very bad sign.

Gordon Southwell ● 2133d2 Comments ● 2128d

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads backed up.

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Bernard Allen ● 2157d19 Comments ● 2133d