Forum Topic

Labour Library Defeat Shows that there is an Alternative

Last night the Labour council was comprehensively defeated over the library closure issue by its residents.  As a councillor that has been part of the fight to save Northfields library I thank every resident who signed every petition, sent every email and stood and supported our libraries. Labour last night tried to claim the plaudits for the u-turn but the reality these proposals should never have been brought forward and it now feels like a gross waste of time and money.  It also shows in simple terms that there is an alternative to the cuts mantra that the administration trot out ahead of every proposal to close services.  If you can save the libraries and still make the savings targets what else could be saved rather than cut?  What else could have been saved that has gone?  For me, this decision vindicates those like me who hold the view that the savings targets are in reality a tough but manageable proportion of the councils total expenditure. This is victory for the idea that the council can maintain services and still make it's sums add up.  The gloom and dispondency that currently surrounds the Labour administration should now be replaced with the conviction to protect services.  This will need strong administrative management of the council.  The library u-turn shows that where there is a will there is a way.  No longer will the Labour council be able to claim that there is no alternative to "the cuts". Yours sincerely Cllr Mark Reen

Mark Reen ● 5582d7 Comments

Cllr Reen's post sounds like a load of Tory spin to me. The cuts are not just an Ealing Labour Group's 'imagined' problem, as Cllr Reen would have us believe. ALL the boroughs in the country are affected, they're ALL forced to cut services and most of them are blaming Cllr Reen's Tory-led government for inflicting particularly harsh cuts on local government. Even the Tory ones!It is disappointing the local Tories have gone down the path of trying to politically exploit the sad situation their residents face by denying the cuts are really necessary, and putting all their time and energy into negative exploitation of every residents' campaign to save services. The Tories have chosen to jump on every bandwagon going in order to try to present themselves as the local heroes in all of this! Ruthless indeed!The reality is that just about every council of every political colour is having to cut services - most of them have made much deeper cuts to front-line services than Ealing. Mr Reen's claim that the 'there is no alternative to the cuts' is a 'cuts mantra' that he alleges is being voiced by the local Labour Administration in isolation, is deliberately misleading. There is something distasteful and dishonest about the political message Ealing's Tory group is propagating. The local Tories are inventing an anti-Labour narrative that is not credible and is inconsistent with what their own party members are saying nationally and in other boroughs.All councils and public bodies face real cuts and Mr Reen is foolish to try to pretend otherwise. A saving not taken in the library service will result in another being taken elsewhere.It would be more helpful if the local opposition councillors worked with the present administration to find acceptable solutions to the cuts that will need to be made for several years to come. The allowances they claim are not there for them to milk every cut for what they can get out of it for selfish political gain. They are there to enable councillors to serve the electorate in a constructive way. So these Tory councillors should start trying to help the situation, not pervert it for their own gain.Are they genuinely happy the libraries are not closing? I doubt it. The amunition they thought they had against the Labour Group has been snatched from them and they feel aggrieved. The whole cuts issue is revealing that the Tory Group's interests are most definitely not the same as residents!

John Holt ● 5582d