Forum Topic

One day I took a step back from myself and realised that I was sweeping things into the middle of the floor so that I could pick them all up at once.  It had just gradually got worse.My back is much better since I did quite a bit of Pilates.  However the teacher who was so good left and I have not kept    it up.  Looking after everyone else always got in the way.I have spent hours at Ealing Hospital waiting to see a Consultant only to be told that he had had to go to a meeting, that they didn't know why I had the appointment and since I was there here is a piece of paper so that you can have an ultrasound scan.  When I arrived at ultrasounds they weren't doing anything but they just laughed at the idea of giving me one since I was there.  Quite a few years ago but doesn't give you a feeling of confidence that they know what they are doing.If private and state could work well together without one taking all the easy pickings and charging a fortune for them then perhaps our system would work well.Unfortunately there is a lot wrong with the NHS.  I have just seen for myself the dire service that the elderly are getting instead of just reading about it.  New buildings that are badly designed - windows that don't open more than a few inches and the blinds have to be pulled down to keep the sun out so covering most of those few inches - and yet still so hot that a portable AC has to be fitted through a window so blocking out all the light to make it cool enough to work (don't know if there are regulations about how cool it needs to be for the patients) together with the tremendous amount of noise one of these makes.  Food from a very reduced menu not chosen by the patient and not suitable for someone who has been complaining of lack of saliva (ie dry flaked tuna or dry grated cheese on dry baked potato (one small foil covered pat of butter) or dry sandwiches).  We know the elderly don't drink enough.  What ARE they thinking?  ARE they thinking?

Philippa Bond ● 5569d

Chris you asked where did I get this from? There is no reference. It is a deduction. We know that about 5% of healthcare is provided by private companies within the NHS.Many purists are not happy but I can just about tolerate this. The big problem for me is the NHS has been around for 63 years and has got better and treated more patients year on year and at a smaller portion of our GDP than most of our neighbours. Who is Lansley to come along from nowhere with 300 pages of radical changes to completely overturn all this? (The failed Forestry bill was easier to understand because it was simple. But this is the same). He and the Conservative party were heavily subsidised by the private healthcare industry before the election. Cameron said there would be no top down changes. He clearly hadn't looked into Lansley's bag. Further all these changes cost. We are told the Health service must change and that is why we have to have Lansley's Bill or its shredded successor but with no more money? We are told the drugs bill is increasing and people are living longer but nowhere in Lansley's bill does it say where all this extra money is coming from. Am I going to be shot when I reach 70? No. Is competition going to improve output? No. Is choice going to save money and improve output? No. So where is all this extra money going to come from? Hence my deduction. This crazy method of governing change has been rejected by most medical professionals. The general public are blissfully unaware because they believed Cameron. And the essence of "killing" the NHS contained in the bill is still there. That's why many of us are so opposed to the Bill.

Arthur Breens ● 5569d