Forum Topics

One can but hope that the new sports centre in Gunnersbury Park burns down too- Gunnersbury Feedback

Gunnersbury Park was established as a place of recreation for the people of Ealing not as a charitable/non-profit organisation for the paying of Sir Somebody-or-other's extortionate salary for running it. It is bounded by three council estates, what did the trustees directors or whoever think was going to happen when then tried to create an haute-cuisine dining experience that charged three times as much as the affordable -public service' (and much loved) cafe did? If they ever catch whoever torched this travesty of public trust that is the new restaurant I hope to contribute to their defence fund, they performed a public service. I can only hope that a similar 'act-of-God' strikes the new sports centre that is designed to provide revenue to fund the salaries of charity/non-profit liggers and not to provide value recreation to local, and often disadvantaged local residents. So much for the 'Gunnersbury Park Historic Buildings Survey ExtendedYour views on uses for small mansion and stables wanted' article on today's Ealing Today, there is plenty of feedback, albeit in the form of arson, it is just that nobody is listening. Endless input to local councillors who view it as more important (and put in more effort) to preserve the operation of their favourite late-night drug-dealing drinking joints than to preserve a useful and accessible public space and facility

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2271d7 Comments ● 2271d

Two metres/Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission

Let us hope Boris does not reduce the social distancing requirements to one metre or three feet in response to requests by pub, restaurant, bar and other hostility trade businesses when they re-open'Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts say' - CNNhttps://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-05-28-20-intl/index.html14 hr 47 min agoSix feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts sayFrom CNN’s Arman AzadPublic health officials have called on people to stay six feet apart to slow the spread of coronavirus through so-called respiratory droplets. But three experts are warning that six feet may not be enough – and they say the world needs to take airborne transmission of the virus seriously.In a commentary published in the journal Science, the experts called for “regular, widespread testing” to find asymptomatic cases, and they pointed to places where mask wearing is universal and the virus has been controlled, like Hong Kong and Taiwan. World Health Organization guidance might not be enough in all situations, they said.“Evidence suggests that (the novel coronavirus) is silently spreading in aerosols exhaled by highly contagious infected individuals with no symptoms,” wrote Chia Wang of National Sun Yat-sen University in Taiwan and Kimberly Prather and Dr. Robert Schooley of the University of California, San Diego.    “Increasing evidence for (the coronavirus) suggests the six foot WHO recommendation is likely not enough under many indoor conditions where aerosols can remain airborne for hours, accumulate over time, and follow air flows over distances further than six feet,” they wrote.The three experts, who are specialists in chemistry and infectious diseases, said aerosols from breathing and speaking “can accumulate, remain infectious in indoor air for hours, and be easily inhaled deep into the lungs.” That makes wearing masks all the more essential, they said, even when people are keeping their distance. More on this: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has focused on so-called respiratory droplets produced when a person coughs or sneezes. The droplets don’t linger in the air for long, but the CDC says they “can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs.” Spread is more likely when people are in close contact with one another, or “within about 6 feet,” the CDC says. That’s because respiratory droplets are relatively large and fall to the ground – unlike aerosols, which are smaller and more likely to stay in the air longer.Despite the focus on droplets from US health officials and others, the experts said “a large proportion of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) appears to be occurring through airborne transmission of aerosols produced by asymptomatic individuals during breathing and speaking.” While more research is needed, they called for robust testing schemes and said people need to mask up. “For society to resume, measures designed to reduce aerosol transmission must be implemented, including universal masking and regular, widespread testing to identify and isolate infected asymptomatic individuals,” they said.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2301d15 Comments ● 2271d