Forum Topics

August smile

What name do you give a lady who has to tell a joke twice? Repunzel.Son: “Dad, we’re learning about prisms at school. They’re fascinating.”Dad: “That’s good son, because as a dyslexic black boy you’re bound to end up in one.” Paddy decides to take up boxing and goes for the required medical. A few days later the doctor ‘phones and says “Paddy, you realise you’ve got sugar diabetes.”Paddy says, “Nice one, when do I fight him?” A dwarf goes to a very good but very busy doctor and asks "I know you are busy but do you treat dwarves?"The doctor replies "Yes, but you will have to be a little patient". In hindsight I should have posted my Facebook status as: "I've blown the head gasket on my 1997 XR3i" rather than "I've just bu**ered a  14 year old escort".The police still haven't seen the funny side, my lap top's been confiscated, and the wife has gone off to her mother.A Yorkshire man takes his cat to the vet.Yorkshireman: "Ayup, lad, I need to talk to thee about me cat."Vet: "Is it a tom?"Yorkshireman: "Nay, I've browt it with us."A Yorkshireman's dog dies and as it was a favourite pet he decides to have a gold statue made by a jeweller to remember the dog by.Yorkshireman: "Can tha mek us a gold statue of yon dog?"Jeweller: "Do you want it 18 carat?"Yorkshireman: "No I want it chewin' a bone yer daft begger!"The last is always bestBloke from Barnsley with piles asks chemist "Nah then lad, does tha sell arse cream?"Chemist replies "Aye, Magnum or Cornetto?"

Graham Weeks ● 2949d2 Comments ● 2946d

NOT another (slum of the future short lifespan) block of flats PLEASE (Wickes site South Ealing)

As Ealing is beaten into mediocrity by the rise of profiteering property developers building huge blocks of ecologically unsustainable flats with short lifespans (20 or 30 years) that clash with the victorian architecture we muat ask questions about what is going to happen with the site that has just changed hands that has the Wickes store on it in South Ealing.God help us if the new owners of the Wickes site want to build a residential tower block there.On the other hand if the site was to become an Aldi, Lidl, or ASDA than that would address the social community necessities of South Ealing from the new developments on the south side of the A4 through to Ealing Broadway with its half-sized Tesco, Morrisons et al. However, like many stores in the high land cost and high rent area of W5 including the shopping centre the Wickes in South Ealing is not a full Wickes as it is just not large enough. It only carries about three-quarters of the product range, an 'Ealing-factor' where all our superstores are too small due to freeholder/land-owner greed and deficient planning policy so I don't hold out too much hope for something that is not a development combining overpriced small retail spaces (no doubt to be filled with yet more chicken shops, hairdressers and small convenience stores) with shoebox studio flats so expensive that they will only be crammed with groups of students to each room, so I guess an overpriced convenience store of sorts is the best that we can expect there in future.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2950d12 Comments ● 2948d

EALING COUNCIL GUILTY OF MALADMINSTRATION

Ealing Council has been found guilty of maladministration by the Ombudsman for refusing to accept a complaint made by myself and 5 of my neighbours.  It concerned a run-down HMO on Uxbridge Road.  The rooms were damp.  The walls were mouldy and crumbling.  The fire-escape route was blocked with furniture and rubbish and there were no fire-doors.  The owner was forced to upgrade it.  No credit to him.   It shouldn’t have been in that state to start with.  Despite his record, the Council reappointed him as a fit and proper person to manage the place.   This is the Council that pretends to care about the conditions people live in! The Council refused to accept the complaint.  It was for that the Ombudsman found it guilty of maladministration.   Four senior officers were involved.   The last, the Executive Director for Corporate Resources,  threatened to declare us “persistent complainants” if we carried on.   We carried on and the Ombudsman supported us, not him.Did they learn their lesson?  No. The  Executive Director for Corporate Resources went ahead, accused us being persistent complainants and imposed a sanction.  Preposterous.  The Ombudsman found us right to persist.  If anything, the Executive Director should have apologised.  We asked CEO Najsarek to dissociate himself from his nonsense.  He failed to do that.  We have made a formal complaint about both of them.  We’ll keep you informed of its progress. The Ombudsman asked the Council to remind officers to handle complaints properly in future.  Two senior officers are still taking not a scrap of notice and sitting on complaints.  Disobeying their employer’s instruction.   Bad enough the LGO rebukes the Council.   10 times worse when the Council treats its findings with cynical scorn.  We were awarded a sum of money.  Who pays?   Thank you, people of Ealing.  You do, from your council tax.  We not only have to pay the salaries of these people we have to compensate ourselves for their misconduct.  This complaint was about senior officers and handled by senior officers.  They are a corrupt collective, covering up for one another. They get away with it because they know they can.  As long as they remain in post, no one can trust the Council’s complaints procedure. No one can trust the Council.What happened to the officer who reappointed the manager?  He is now in charge of Safer Communities.  Hope the fire-brigade is on alert.  It could only happen in London’s rottenest Borough!  

vincent paul WRIGLEY ● 2976d19 Comments ● 2953d