Forum Topics

Is The Idea of a Gender Pay Gap a disaster for women?

At a wedding over the weekend I caught up with two of my college friends who were both working in the field of PR and we got talking about the Gender Pay Gap. They hadn't seen each other of years but they both had almost the same thing to say about the issue. Basically their job has become largely about ensuring the companies they work for are not seen as 'institutionally misogynist.'The challenge is that in both firms the highest paid people will be ones with particular professional qualifications and men make up the larger proportion who have the required skills. They have done everything they can to maximise the number of women recruited including short lists which are always split 50-50. However it is very difficult to recruit proportionally more women. Even though most interviews are carried out by women they tend to chose by qualifications and talent rather than by gender to the point that they select a lower proportion of women than male interviewers. The senior women are more concerned about the effectiveness of the people they work with than the gender balance at the firms. Even so at both firms a woman is likely to be paid more than a man with equivalent experience because of her scarcity value.This puts pressure on HR departments because it makes the gender pay ratio look really bad. You can't affect the numbers at the top end so the only solution is to look at the lower end of the pay scale. This has two impacts - firstly there is an unspoken rule to ensure that as many of the lowest paid jobs at the firms are taken by men. These are roles like cleaners and admin which would previously had been largely filled by women. Secondly they are reducing the proportion of women taken on at graduate recruitment level.The next result of a focus only on the gender pay gap is that women from lower income groups are losing out on much needed jobs and younger graduate women are not getting as many opportunities as they used to. In the longer term this is just going to make the gender pay issue worse.Both of my friends blamed the BBC for the problem saying that they see this issue purely through the prism of the gender pay gap and it has frightened many boards of directors into taking action. However, whether Clare Balding gets paid as well as John Humphries has little relevance for most companies.

Tricia Arbuthnot ● 2710d10 Comments ● 2683d

Dockless bicycles.

Just received the following email.Dear Sir or Madam,The following response has been made to the ePetition titled "Ask the council to, Debate, consult in public and review the dockless bike schemes in Ealing Borough." that you signed:The Council’s policy is to increase the cycling mode share, this has significant air quality and health benefits and is likely to reduce demand for car parking spaces over time. As such, the dockless cycle hire scheme is helping us achieve this policy.  There were over 2,000 rides last week week using dockless cycles and with very few complaints from the public since the scheme was first implemented in September 2017.  The vast majority of bikes are left in reasonable locations for future hire.  Leaving them in multiple places actually increases, not decreases access to a bicycle as claimed. If you do see a bicycle completely blocking the footway, the contact details on the bike will allow you to report it; the operators have a few hours to respond as per our agreement with them and to date they have been reasonably good at doing so and have been generally compliant with both the TfL code of practice and the agreement with the Council. Also, it is incorrect to state that Manchester rejected the scheme.  It was a commercial decision by Mobike to withdraw the service.  The levels of vandalism and theft are significantly lower in Ealing, but there is no cost to the public purse when this does occasionally occur.

Dennis Bailey ● 2723d42 Comments ● 2686d

Volunteer! Read with children

Do you remember a character from a childhood book as fondly as an old friend?If you do, you’ll know the magic of being able to slip into another world as and when you need to, or how books can make your world a bigger, brighter place.For bookworms especially, it’s hard to believe that anyone could see reading as anything other than empowering, or even just a pleasure. For the third of children from disadvantaged areas who leave primary school without being able to read well, often it’s nothing but a chore.That’s why we like to turn up on the doorstep, with a backpack of books, two little stools, and a pair of volunteers who know that words take you places. Every week, come rain or shine, our volunteers bring the magic of reading directly into families’ homes every week, in low-income areas across London.Doorstep Library volunteers don’t just read stories; they do the silly voices, handpick the books, and give special recommendations. By making it fun first, we get to watch children transform into budding readers. We love when parents get stuck in with the sessions too and encourage them to get involved in their children’s education.Sometimes though, we’re just there to give a bit of extra support, whether we’re passing on info about a family activity, lending an ear, or even just being a friendly face. Then, before we go, we leave behind a selection of books for each child to borrow for the week.If this sounds like the role for you, these are the basics. We run projects on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday afternoons in estates across Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lambeth.In Hammersmith and Fulham, we start at 3.45pm and finish at 6.30pm. With some projects starting 4.30pm and finishing at 7.00pm.If you'd like to know more contact Daniela Cardoso at volunteer@doorsteplibrary.org.uk

Daniela Cardoso ● 2693d0 Comments ● 2693d