Forum Topics

What DO our elected Councillors and Council Officers REALLY DO?

Gerry (Mr Tan)! Based on your recent comments on this Forum about the quality of Bond Street I purposefully went off and looked at Bond Street again. Perhaps I was being too unkind? The build quality of the pavement is really good. The natural stone flags have stood the test of footfall and weather well. However, it is the build quality of the work that was done five years that has allowed the street to remain straight and level. Around this, however, there is an air of creeping neglect that suggests that Ealing Council does not really care what is happening hear, or cannot maintain the road. Whether this is financial, political, or due to the main Contractors (Enterprise!) I do not know, however my investigation is intriguing.Starting at the North-East top corner of Bond Street there is a (once-) white painted grill that opens onto the street:It is ajar and reveals what looks like several years of accrued rubbish.As you go down the street you notice the way in which the local businesses are narrowing the busy pavement with their planters and “window boxes” making it difficult to go along the pavement more than one abreast in certain places.The impressive and robust planters have withstood a few years of hard use, however, are clearly not being looked after. On closer inspection this planter has an extensive collection of cigarette ends, rubbish and weeds inside it.Further down the street the topiarised Buxus hedge balls have been allowed to die completely and not replaced. Some sensible individual thought to put some annual bedding in here as a temporary stop gap, though on closer inspection there is nice selection of rubbish and cigarette ends in there; a length of rusty braided wire rope loops up from the soil (originally used as to anchor the roots of the Buxus to stop it being pulled up by thieves and vandals it remains) to trap the unwary child's fingers...Further down the street there are more dying bushes and a staved-in container (this plant is in need of urgent help), and yet more rubbish.Across the road there is a damaged parking meter with yellow and black tape on it leaning at a strange angle awaiting repair.Overshadowing it all across a quarter of the West side of Bond Street are the closed and boarded front of the old YMCA and the associated charity shops; bought by the Council for use as part of the projected film quarter development. Boarded and empty they represent an important asset that the community could use.Bond Street in Ealing, being at the very centre of wealth and business in Ealing, you think would attract greater scrutiny than it does from the main political parties: situated in a Conservative ward in a Borough run by a Labour Council you would think both Conservatives and Labour would be micro-managing this prime site? However, it seems to be suffering the same level of indifference from both parties except, of course, Southall. You would think that all parties would be jumping up and down on the Council Officers and the contractors to ensure Bond Street was A1plusplus AND CLAIMING THIS FOR THEMSELVES. Especially as there is a local election in May!As a final thought, the quality of the real stone pavement seems to have given it a longer life than a cheaper alternative, however, I think that we must bear in mind that this project was conceived and enacted in wealthier times, i.e. before the “credit crunch” and what was acceptable and indeed lauded is not now. The pavement in front of Ealing Town Hall is over-ostentatious, and the immensely expensive cut granite paving stones being used in Southall have a positively “Marie Antoniette – Let them eat Cake” factor about them in  the light of emerging food banks. Based on a stroll through the quality retail street of Central Ealing, I am lead to wonder yet again what the politicians who say they are represent us are actually do?

Peter Mcleod ● 4544d0 Comments ● 4544d

Guerrilla Gardening - Saturday 1st March

Some of you might know the unloved pathway between the Northfield Avenue allotments and the gardens of Loveday Road. You can see it on the google map here..http://tinyurl.com/od67gqgWe've* recently discovered that the pathway belongs to the allotments, which was a bit of a surpise.  So we have decided to adopt it and try and tidy it up. The short term plan is to clear the mud off the tarmac path, sow wildflowers and build a loggery for the stag beetles (which have been spotted on the allotments). We have made a start and you can see what we've already done here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walk-putting-our-plan-actionThe long term plan for the pathway - which we have named Radbourne Walk - is to manage it as a wildlife corridor. We also want ot make it a pleasant place for people too. So if you use it as a short cut or take the dog for a walk we hope you'll find it a pleasant place to be and actually walk along with a spring in your step as you enjoy the flowers. ;-) You can find out more about what inspired us and what our plans are - here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walkIf you are up for a bit of volunteer gardening - you'd be very welcome - even if you only spare us an hour.The next session in on Saturday 1st  March. Our aim is to clean another section of path, we’ll also sow another wildflower meadow and create the first loggery for the stag beetles.We will be working on the lower section near Occupation Road. If you would like to volunteer bring a garden fork, spade, rake or stiff broom. We'll meet on the footpath at 10am on Saturday 1st March for a quick briefing and then off we go. Do let us know if you are coming  (email  allotmentsw13@gmail.com )  - just so we can bring enough tea bags ;-)Christina FoxChair: Ealing Dean Allotment Society* We are the newly formed Ealing Dean Allotment Society - set up to manage the allotments in Northfields Avenue on behalf on our landlord Pathways. All our members are plot holders at Northfields.The aims of the Society are:2.1           To provide a safe, secure, accessible and well-managed allotment site for the benefit of the Members of the Society (“the Members”)2.2           To improve and enhance the allotments for the greater convenience and enjoyment of the Members2.3           To be a good neighbour to the local community2.4           To conserve the allotment as a green space in a built-up area and secure its long term use as allotment gardens and a haven for wildlife and its conservation2.5           To contribute to healthy living through open-air physical activity and the cultivation of natural food produce, flowers and fruit trees2.6           To foster community fellowship and social relationships between Members, irrespective of age, gender, faith, race, ethnic origin, disability or sexual orientation.2.7           To promote the art, science and practice of horticulture among Members and the wider community of Ealing.

Christina Fox ● 4593d21 Comments ● 4546d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 12

An open letter to Ealing’s Council Leader Councillor Julian Bell published in the Ealing Gazette Friday 21 March 2014GOING DUTCH [is last resort for town - editor]Ealing Council’s plan to create a ‘mini-Holland’ for cyclists in the Borough (Gazette 14 March) may conjure up visions of cyclists freely sharing the pavements with pedestrians.I would like to remind the plan’s author, Councillor Julian Bell, that shared use of footpaths is very much a last resort for town planners according to the Department for Transport guidance “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists”. This document says among other things; “It is important to recognise that pedestrians and cyclists are not homogeneous groups and their needs vary considerably”; “Where the need for cyclists to use existing footways or footpaths has been identified …….. their right to be there must be established by changing the legal status of the footway or footpath to that of a cycle track.”; “Where the facility is an adjacent use one - the remainder is a footway or footpath”; “It is illegal for a cyclist to ride on the pedestrian side, but the cycle track will normally retain a right of way for people on foot.”  “No impression should be given that it is acceptable to cycle on the pedestrian side.” “This may need to be reinforced by local publicity and enforcement action.” Perhaps the first thing Councillor Bell should do is spend a small amount of the considerable funds allocated for improving cycling facilities in the Borough on a poster campaign emphasising the illegality of pavement cycling under Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 and the penalties for doing so under the 1999 amendment to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (SI 1999/1851), no mention of which appears in any of the Council’s propaganda or training literature encouraging the greater use of cycles.Tony Purton – by e-mailThe following draft paper to the Greater London Assembly sets out this proposition in the simplest terms. If Ealing Council really wants to ‘lead’ in encouraging more cycling in the Borough it should set an example to other London Boroughs by actively discourage pavement cycling, and act before it is pushed!                          A DRAFT PAPER TO THE GREATER LONDON ASSEMBLY                                                         PROPOSING                   A PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES                                                   ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT AS INTENDED BY THE CREATION OF FIXED PENALTY POWERS UNDER THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988 – SI 1999/1851 THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable self-adhesive labels on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right on a white background, surrounding a black pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol .Such a measure would ensure that no-one could be in any doubt about the law. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI 1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)6.  Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.THE EFFECT - Hopefully the result would be that in time pavement cycling will attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places, a criminal offence under the Health Act 2006,  and become as self-policing as the ‘SmokeFree’ laws; the enforcement of which is the responsibility of managers of ‘smokefree’ premises through compulsory signage and ‘verbal’ warnings to customers under the supervision of local authority enforcement officers, such as environmental health officers, trading standards or local community support officers – if physical violence is threatened by a person smoking, managers should seek assistance from the police. See http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social as well as an illegal activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement” [see PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 6 on Page  6 or 7]=======================OFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/madeLTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists:  http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/LTN%202- 04%20Adjacent%20and%20Shared%20Use%20Facilities%20for%20Pedestrians%20and%20Cyclists.pdf

Tony Purton ● 4565d41 Comments ● 4546d