Forum Topics

New ePetition about Dockless bikes (Mobikes etc)

Are you happy with the way these new bikes just landed on our streets? Within weeks they seemed to become randomly distributed around all our local roads left in an amazing variety of inconvenient places – often on their side and some have even been seen in rivers.There’s a new petition about this on the Ealing Council website (there’s a separate one for Hounslow – below)https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx  • These are commercial schemes which should be creating a new, flexible and cheap choice of transport.  • Instead, many users seem to ignore pedestrians who might just want to walk on uncluttered pavements and roads    o With blocked thoroughfares life gets harder.    o Harder for the young    o Harder for Mums with buggies or pushchairs    o Harder for our more elderly neighbours    o Harder even for the users – who wants to get to a bike on the app at the end of a cul de sac?  • Any other type of pavement/road blockage is often regarded as unlawful  • There was recent news came that the bikes had also been used in drug related crime  • If the gps technology is vandalised they can simply go off grid and are left  • If the batteries run down the operators say they can simply go off grid and “disappear”  • It can also be argued the schemes are in breach of the tfl code of practice   • http://content.tfl.gov.uk/dockless-bike-share-code-of-practice.pdf  • There simply seems to be no scheme management at all which is not consistent with what tfl seem to think is appropriateThere are commercial schemes with negligible management or responsibilityThe petition on the council website (https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx) needs 1500 signatures to “win” a council debate OBJECTIVES1. To have a council debate2. For the council to agree to a public consultation (in common with Hounslow council - https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/dockless/consultation/intro/ )3. Then for Ealing to agree to a complete scheme review based on the results of the public consultationThe deadline for the 1500 signatures is March 18th

Don Tanswell ● 2761d2 Comments ● 2759d

Dr Rupa Huq Plays the Race Card

Dr Huq reference to the casual racism of the 70s made me laugh as I loved Jim Davidson. What is not funny is that the anti-Catholic atheistic Marxists like Dr Huq and Jon Trickett who was obviously around in the 1970s are holding a Labour Party organised anti-Brexit rally they have deliberately mislabelled an Anti-Racism Rally. On Wednesday 27th February from 7:30pm till 9:30pm in St Mary’s Church Hall, St Mary’s Road, South Ealing. Eve Turner from the Ealing Trades Union Council will introduce Julian Bell then Steve Hadley of the militant Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers then Nahella Ashraf, another Labour Party member in the Stand Up To Racism organisation. In apparently a Christian church hall this group of sad Remoaners are really creating another strand of @Project Fear by creating racial tension.Dr Huq has tried repeatedly tried to get on any media to fill her own pockets by accusing White people of being racists. It is the well tried tool of her mates like Diane Abbott who earns £200,000 a year from TV appearances. I do hope is Balwinder Rana, spokesperson for West London Stand Up To Racism will be available to answer questions. First I want to know about how much taxpayer’s money is being used to pay these anti-Catholic atheistic Marxists and rent the hall. Second since Jon Trickett, Labour MP for Hemsworth  has confessed that racism is in his DNA does he think all White people should be excluded from the Labour Party or just Yorkshiremen?Rupa Huq would not be allowed in the Independent Group or in any group that prevents racism as it is clear her only plan like her other pal Sadiq Khan is to get re-elected by calling all White people racists, imho

Martin Cain ● 2764d20 Comments ● 2759d

Woolworth's Facade

On 20th February Ealing Planning Cttee voted overwhelmingly to approve A2Dominion's development plans for total demolition of the old Woolworth's building in West Ealing. The recent article on Ealing Today incorrectly implies that the preservation of our local heritage, including the 1930's Art Deco Woolworth's facade in the Broadway, was removed from the Neighbourhood Plan for West Ealing Centre.The West Ealing Centre Neighbourhood Plan was drawn up after extensive community consultation over a period of almost 5 years and was formally adopted as an important element of Ealing's Local Statutory Development Plan on 3rd May 2018. The plan accurately reflects the hopes and wishes of local people, was approved at a public meeting of the membership and includes an important policy on preservation and conservation of our heritage.  Demolition of the much loved landmark Woolworth's facade is contrary to the Paragraph 5 of Heritage Policy 14 as well as Paragraphs 6.4 & 6.5. Indeed Paragraph 6 of the agreed plan makes specific provision for the use of Section 106 & CIL funding for the conservation & preservation of the Woolworth's facade. A copy of the adopted Neighbourhood Plan can be found on the council website. It appears that some members of the Ealing's Planning committee were unaware of the recommendations contained within the Neighbourhood Plan or maybe just didn't feel that the views of hundreds, if not thousands, of local people were relevant. How sad that central government is spending large amounts of public money and time encouraging local people to work together as a community only to have their views ignored by our planning system. Preservation of the Woolworth's facade is also supported by a petition of almost 1200 and the planning application for the site itself was vehemently opposed by around 300 people during the consultation stage. Local people believe that the structure could and should be preserved by incorporating it into the design of a new residential block.Is it now time to ask whether our planning system is representative and still fit for purpose?

David Randles ● 2763d9 Comments ● 2759d

The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq M.P. COULD have won the high ground instead of launchinga peer-level spat

The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq M.P. I.M.O. COULD have won the high ground instead of launching a peer-level spat with the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge while contributing towards the education of the U.K. population (if not the World) by educating rather than attacking. One of those wonderful, subtle, letters written on House of Commons headed paper sent to the "Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge" (and released to the press) informing her of her error in the use of the Ebglish language (of course pointing out that the Honourable M.P. for Penistone and Stockbridge could not be presumed to have been intentionally racist)  and explaining how the English language should be used when discussing ethnicity, race and origin). A minimum of a  dozen page guide including a dictionary, lexicon and taxonomy of the appropriate use of the English language (which I as an old git with a traditional education in English usage would find useful, e.g. a formal definition of "B.A.M.E." and its appropriate usage) would serve as a much more effective put down of the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge than an undignified frontal attach over an error of English usage. I am confident that the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge did not INTEND to be racist, and in British law there is the idea that for a crime to be committed there has to be the act as well as the MENS REA or guilty mind which is the intention to commit the crime!The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq, M.P. is an able analyst and meta-analyst of culture, race and ethnicity (as her books and publications show), and if ANYONE can put together a guide to inclusive and appropriate English it would be her absolutely.The idea of Parliament was that the M.P.s would debate and discuss rather than physically fight each other, hence the two opposing being two sword lengths and a hands-breadth apart so that even the sword tips could not engage. However, to allow such discussion we need an appropriate language to debate in where the meaning of issues are discussed rather than the undignified duelling other language errorsOver to you Doctor Huq M.P. educate and discuss or go to war? As long as we are talking we are not fighting!

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2759d0 Comments ● 2759d