Forum Topics

How some can bend the system and others cannot

Interesting to see a builder fined for his unauthorised dumping and scaffolding in South Ealing. Intersting too the quotes from Cllr Mahfouz.Maybe he should have taken a walk around a few other streets in South ealing and ask a few questions of the lack of joined up enforcement in the monitoring of building and planning in this town.How about this for blatant abuse of the system: 1. Erect a new fence and wall around your property, but quietly move the boundary 4 inches or so out into the pavement by claiming the cemented area between the pavement and the property.2. Hope no-one will notice or have photographs of said pavement.3. Wait a short while and put in a planning application for works.4. Somehow, find a way that leaves residents affected uninformed over alterations 5. Build right out to the new line demolishing part of 'new fence and wall.6. Fit gas heating vents and condensor outlets that overhang pavement and blow fumes and steam into faces of pedestrians at face height7. Get away with it.How? Well question 4 remains unexplained by LBE and the local residents associations.As for the encroaching of the pavement well it is for highways to notice and act, but as it was some months prior to the planning application, no-one checked or noticed...or did they? Some residents have keen eyes and did notice.Highways do not have to inform building control or planning of any discrepancy or where the correct boundary should be. No-one at planning noticed or checked until it was too late.  Only a few inches, but principals should exist here surely? Or we would all be doing it.As for heating equipment, Building control apparently require nothing more than a safety certificate from the gas fitter.Yet other heating vents are refused on grounds of being to near to other properties of people. But it's ok to have it straight in ones face? On a footway that has a lot of users?So how come it appears to be one rule for some and a different one for others?Cosy relationships with officers and architects/builders?Resident with good contacts?Who knows, but clearly some scheming has been going on somewhere.

Oliver Gregan ● 5770d5 Comments ● 5765d

Meanest traffic warden in Ealing??!!

Last night (Friday 10th December) at around 6 pm I went to buy a Christmas tree from 'The Christmas Forest' outlet opposite the Ramada Hotel with my 10 year old daughter to buy a Christmas tree.I parked immediately outside of the fence to the outlet where there was a notice which said clearly that the area was 'designated parking for customers of the Christmas Forest'.Within less than 10 minutes we had purchased a tree but when we returned to the car to load up, an Ealing traffic warden was in the process of giving me a parking ticket.He refused to withdraw the ticket as apparently no-one from the company had had the area de-designated from a single yellow line which was in force until 6:30 pm, even though I said I was loading up. He said that there had been a couple of incidents before where he had pointed this out to staff working at the facility so effectively I am the sacrificial lamb(!). We tried to make him see reason and to take it up with the company but as the law stands I am unlikely to win an appeal, given that the notice was on private land, and that the company had apparently been warned that parking was not permitted on that road at that time. It also is an utter waste of my time in this busy festive season and caused my daughter considerable distress in what should have been a pleasant family experience.In future I will buy my Christmas tree from an outlet where a £100 parking fine does not come as part of the package....Have any other readers had a similar experience or know of other examples of council wardens showing a complete lack of flexibility or common sense?

Andy Holt ● 5769d6 Comments ● 5767d