Forum Topics

An Open Letter to Ed Balls

An Open Letter to the Secretary of State for Education Ed BallsThe debate over the trajectory of the western sociopolitical system and its strained relations with Islam is the most pivotal of our time.  Muslims are in one of the most difficult phases of their history when malicious attacks including allegation of terrorism are being made on Islam and Muslims all over the world. The malicious campaign against Muslims is politically motivated. The world is obsessed by Islam. Anti-terror measures are ruining lives of Muslim youths. If you go around arresting young Muslims, you are going to find that you are going to ostracise this community. Young Muslims don’t need to be ostracized, they need to be engaged. According to the Arch Bishop, Rowan Williams, acceptance of some facets of Sharia not only “seems unavoidable”, but could actually improve social cohesion. Muslims should be able to choose to have marital or financial matters dealt with in a Sharia Court. Such courts should therefore be incorporated into the British legal system as a constructive accommodation with Islam.  Schools are being asked to help “win hearts and minds” in the battle against violent extremists on both sides. British born Imams should go into schools to supplement the teaching of RE, PSHE and Citizenship so that all pupils can learn about the Holy Quran and Islam in the context of a multicultural society. OFSTED must make sure that their services should be fully utilised by the schools, otherwise, it will be waste of public money. The British Establishment is wrong to assert that Imams and Masajid have been radicalising Muslim youths.  The roots of extremism are in the British society and schools where institutional racism is at its peak. The racism within schools has got little media coverage. The school attended by 7/7 bombers in a part of Leeds known for its history of racial tension between British Asians and native Brits. Leeds council was so worried about the violence that it had to call in Foundation for Peace, a government funded peacekeepers who were used to keep Catholics and Protestants from killing one another in Northern Ireland. True message of Islam should be promoted because British media and society have always portrayed Islam in a negative way since Crusades and the siege of Vienna in 1683.  School Curriculum should be used to convey a deeper understanding of Islamic faith, history and culture. Prison is not the answer of those who are vulnerable to, or are being drawn into violent extremism unless they have clearly committed an offence. The greatest challenge to humanity is learning to live in a crowded and interconnected world that is creating unprecedented pressures on human society. The rector of Oxford’s largest Anglican Churches has called a Muslim call to prayers from the main Masjid “un-English”. This is a clear case of intolerance. Gibraltar is a British colony. Five Pound currency note has a queen image on one side and on the other side there is an image of the Muslim Conqueror with a sword in his hand. There is more hatred of Muslims seduced by the Western media, education system and church leaders like Bishop Nazir Ali. Catholic nuns have worn veils for centuries, with no public controversies arising. There is no reason why any girl’s school uniform can not now be modified to include a veil. Wearing a veil to school or to work must be a matter of choice for all. Iftikhar Ahmad www.londonschoolofislamics.or.guk

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 6559d75 Comments ● 6487d

Make no bones about

Make no bones aboutMeaningTo state a fact in a way that allows no doubt. To have no objection to.OriginThis is another of those ancient phrases that we accept with our mother's milk as an idiom but which seem quite strange when we later give it some thought. When we are trying to convey that we acknowledge or have no objection to something, why bring bones into it?It has been suggested that the bones were dice, which were previously made from bone and are still called bones in gambling circles. That explanation doesn't stand up to scrutiny - 'to make no dice about it' makes little sense. Also, in a 1542 translation of Erasmus's Paraphrase of Luke he discussed the command given to Abraham to sacrifice Isaac and wrote that 'he made no bones about it but went to offer up his son.' Erasmus wasn't noted for his visits to the gaming tables and would hardly have used betting terminology to discuss a biblical text.The actual source of this phrase is closer to home and hearth. In 15th century England, if someone wanted to express their dissatisfaction with something, they didn't 'make bones about it', they used the original form of the phrase and 'found bones in it'. This is a reference to the unwelcome discovery of bones in soup - bones = bad, no bones = good. If you found 'no bones' in your meal you were able to swallow it without any difficulty or objection. The earliest citation of the phrase in print comes from the Paston Letters, which include a collection of texts from 1459 relating to a dispute between Paston and the family of the Norfolk soldier Sir John Fastolf (Fastolf was, incidentally, the source of the character Sir John Falstaff in Shakespeare's Henry IV). In the Paston Letters, the context of which is that the litigants are finally accepting a verdict with no objection, Paston includes the line:"And fond that tyme no bonys in the matere." [and found that time no bones in the matter]'Making bones' is usually expressed in the negative. There are rare occurrences of people being described as 'making bones' about this or that, and an early example comes from Richard Simpson's The School of Shakspere, 1878:"Elizabeth was thus making huge bones of sending some £7000 over for the general purposes of the government in Ireland."'Make no bones about it' is now rather archaic and heard less often than before. It did return briefly during the 1980s, as an example of the 'waiter, I'll have a crocodile sandwich, and make it snappy' form of joke. 'Waiter, I'll have tomato soup and make no bones about it' linked neatly back to the phrase's culinary origin. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Add a phrase a week to your own web site or blog. (www.phrases.org.uk/a-phrase-a-week/add.html)Phrase Thesaurus - Writer's Aid (www.phrasefinder.co.uk)Phrases and sayings - meanings and origins. (www.phrases.org.uk/meanings)Copyright © Gary Martin

Peter Wright ● 6490d0 Comments ● 6490d

3 out ot 4 Councils sending your recycled rubbish to landfill

Household rubbish put out for recycling is being dumped in landfill sites or sent to incinerators by three out of four councils, a Daily Telegraph investigation has discovered.   Up to 200,000 tonnes of recyclable waste was dumped last year with some councils failing to recycle over 10 per cent of glass, paper, plastic and other materials left out by conscientious homeowners. The amount dumped this year is expected to rise sharply as councils struggle to sell recyclable waste during the economic downturn. The disclosure will anger millions of British families, many of whom are being forced to sort their waste into five different waste bins - including new "food slop" containers - to allow it to be recycled. Over the Christmas period families will generate more recycling waste from wrapping paper, bottles and cardboard packaging than at any other time of year. But with prices for recycled material falling, increasing volumes will end up dumped or destroyed. Under the Labour Government, councils have adopted increasingly controversial tactics to meet waste disposal guidelines, with half scrapping weekly bin collections to force people to recycle more. The Government is also pressing ahead with trials for new bin taxes in the Spring which will see fines levied on households which throw out too much rubbish. Most councils collect recycling from the kerbside and then pay for contractors to take it off their hands. The contractors are responsible for processing the materials. While the economy was booming there was high demand for recycled products. However, in recent months the global downturn has hurt prices for scrap metal and recycled plastic and other materials, making dumping waste a more attractive option. Environmental experts last night said that the actions of the councils may undermine attempts to encourage households to recycle more waste. Neil Rippon, managing director of Greencycle, a recycling contractor, said: "If residents know their recycling is going to landfill what incentive is there for residents to recycle it?" Eric Pickles, the Conservatives' Local Government Secretary, said: "This once again shatters the Government's green credentials. "Labour's idea of recycling is dumping huge mountains of rubbish on landfill sites and in warehouses fuelling the 80 million strong rat population. The sad reality is that families who want to go green can't under Labour. "Hardworking households feeling the pinch are being clobbered with bin fines, bin cuts and bin taxes." The Daily Telegraph surveyed all 400 councils across England and Wales. Of the 209 which replied, more than 75 per cent admitted to sending at least some of their recyclable waste to landfill sites or incinerators. With landfill tax standing at £32 per tonne councils are potentially spending an extra £6.4million sending recycling to be dumped. Landfill tax will rise to £40 per tonne next year, sending the potential cost spiralling to £8million. The councils responding to the survey admitted dumping a total of 100,503 tonnes of recyclable waste in landfill or sending it to incinerators in the 2007/08 financial year. If the figure is extrapolated to all councils in England, it suggests that nearly 200,000 tonnes of recycling is being dumped every year. In the survey, the worst offenders were Medway and Peterborough councils which sent 11 per cent of their total recyclable waste - including materials deposited at bottlebanks and in composting facilities - to landfill sites and incinerators. Pembrokeshire Council said 19 per cent of all kerbside recycling would end up in landfill. Derbyshire County Council revealed up to 30 per cent of recyclable cans will end up not being recycled. Leeds City Council, whose local MP is environment secretary Hilary Benn, said it dumped four per cent of waste earmarked for recycling every year. Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, added: "People are constantly lectured on recycling and threatened with fines if they don't comply, so it's outrageous that councils are just throwing the stuff away." The economic downturn has led to a sharp fall in the price of raw materials and therefore the demand for recyclable material has also dropped dramatically. Many councils are left with large amounts of waste that they are unable to sell for recycling. Some councils have also admitted sending waste for recycling to the Far East to be processed, producing a carbon footprint that raises major question marks about the environmental benefits of the process. Paul Levett, managing director for Veolia Environmental Services which handles recycling for 100 local authorities, said: "Manufacturing and reprocessing sectors in the UK are not large enough to create significant demand for the volume of materials that is now being recycled." A survey by the Local Government Association found that five per cent of local authorities are having to store recyclable materials for longer than usual. At Plymouth Council they are still stockpiling recyclable materials from 2006. An association spokesman said: "Councils strive to ensure that as much can be recycled as possible after families take the time to do their bit for the environment. Some of the councils with the worst records admitted they could do better. A spokesman for Havering Council, which dumped 10.4 per cent of its waste, said: "Only a tiny fraction of the 13 million tonnes of household waste put out for recycling does not end up being recycled. "We feel that we could improve the contamination rate, which is why we are running a campaign next year to reduce it and improve participation in our kerbside service." Wayne Fitzgerald, the councillor in charge of recycling at Peterborough City Council which dumped 11 per cent, said: "I think 11 per cent is not a bad figure because only five per cent goes to landfill and the rest goes to incinerators and is used for fuel." A Medway council spokesman disputed the Government’s official figures which showed that 11 per cent of its waste is incinerated or dumped in landfill. He said: “The waste is mixed in the collection hall making it impossible to state which are any authority’s materials and hence the exact proportion of contaminated, and therefore non-recyclable waste sent to landfill that was collected in Medway. “The recycling rate that Medway shares with its residents takes into account any rejections. Approximately 30 per cent of all waste collected by the council is recycled or sent to compost.” Carmarthenshire County Council, which dumped 7.7 per cent of its waste, said: "We have identified areas where the quality of materials put into the blue bags needs improving. "In the New Year waste services officers will be deployed to these areas to actively engage with residents to encourage improvement in quality." A spokesman for Bedfordshire County Council, which dumped 8.5 per cent of material sent for recycling, said: "No recycling is sent to landfill, only contaminated and non-recyclable waste is sent. "From January 2009 we will be introducing facilities to recycle a greater number of plastics which will immediately reduce the percentage of waste sent to landfill. The Department for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs said: "There is a strong incentive for local authorities and recycling facilities to minimise the amount of contaminated recycling due to the cost of extra material going to landfill as well as the loss of revenue from recycled materials."

David Archer ● 6493d2 Comments ● 6493d

New Leaf Decision - Public Invited to Watch on 17th

7:00pm on Wednesday 17th December, Ealing Town Hall is the place to be to watch local democracy in action. Councillors from far flung outer Ealing Wards will decide whether Glenkerrin's latest attempt at a towering housing estate with retail is to be built in the centre of Ealing. There's also another Glenkerrin proposal to be decide upon which involves collecting all the Haven Green bus stops and locating them all 100 metres north of the entrance to Ealing Broadway Station.Just to remind you all, this all involves 567 flats rising to 25 storeys; a retail area the size of Ealing Broadway Centre; and loss of public land and 28 mature trees on Haven Green. Bizarrely the residential tower block and retail developemnt won't start till 2011 and the Haven Green works won't start till 2016.Neither of these proposals remotely addresses the most pressing central Ealing dysfunction - that of the lack of an integrated, scaleable transport hub. The new flats and retail planned will certainly make transport worse with gridlock inevitable in Springbridge Road and consequently elsewhere in the centre. Remember that 3,000 residents wrote in with objections to the 'old' Leaf, of which the 'new' Leaf is but a many times revised version. It's still not too late for you to comment to the Council on these proposals. See www.saveealingscentre.com for details on what's proposed; some sample objections; and how and to where you should send your comments. Do it, however, before 17th December.

Eric Alan Leach ● 6506d32 Comments ● 6494d