Forum Topics

Trolleybuses:  something positive for Uxbridge Road  -  what the Gag-ette didn't want you to read

While pretending to reflect the clear public feeling against the Uxbridge Road tram scheme the Ealing Gag-ette has given the tram promoters and supporters opportunities for pro-team propaganda while quietly suppressing any comparable publicity for the most promising alternative means of bringing the many benefits of electric traction: TROLLEYBUSES.For example the Gag-ette published in 2003 a half-page 'Viewpoint' article by a reader titled 'So many reasons to have the tram'. In response I later wrote the article below explaining why trolleybuses are a much better idea. They even encouraged me to submit it for publication but have never published it, nor other pro-trolleybus articles and letters. It appears that the Gag-ette is in reality a closet tram supporter, probably because they think the tram will increase the value of their Uxbridge Road premises. High time for some competition in our local news media. Meanwhile here's the text my suppressed article:-Trams?  -   There is a better way:  TrolleybusesTramways cost too much, lose money, do little to cut traffic and don’t link to other transport modes. That’s the view of the National Audit Office, not just mine. And without even taking account of the disruption and chaos while they’re being built, and once they’re up and running.The Uxbridge Road tramway hasn’t a hope of being built because the necessary private finance won’t be forthcoming, yet Ealing Council and Transport for London continue to ignore well-founded local concerns and waste millions of pounds developing the scheme, while neglecting provision of even basic facilities such as passenger shelters and seating on other local bus routes in west London.The truth, which vested interests, naïve ‘green’ activists and blinkered tram fanatics refuse to see, is that it’s just not possible to fit a street tramway into a busy main road corridor like Uxbridge Road from Shepherds Bush to Hanwell without unacceptable disruption to local access and other activities, and without starving the rest of the transport system of investment. Only a trolleybus system can bring the huge environmental benefits of electric traction cost-effectively and without the disruption.Trolleybuses are powered by electricity from overhead wires, like trams, but run freely on rubber tyres like buses, thus giving trams’ freedom from noise, fumes and vibration while retaining buses’ flexibility and avoiding the need to push everybody else out of the way to make room for fixed tram tracks in the road. Unlike trams, trolleybuses can, and do, steer round parked vehicles and other obstructions.Because they don’t need rail tracks, trolleybus systems can be installed for a fraction of the cost, construction time and disruption of street tramways. That’s why trolleybuses replaced tramways in many cities, including London, before being killed off themselves by the oil and bus vested interests  -   London Transport actually commissioned Shell Oil to advise them on whether to keep trolleybuses or replace them with diesel buses!In other countries modern trolleybuses are running successfully, and world cities such as Rome and Athens are introducing new trolley systems. Worldwide there are more trolleybus systems than tramways, including the well-established and popular system in Lyons (see picture) with its sleek modern vehicles. Not everybody likes overhead wires, though modern trolleybus wires are much neater than tram overhead, and the visual impact is far outweighed by the absence of noise, fumes and vibration, compared to buses idling at stops or in traffic queues, which they inevitably have to much of the time in busy areas like this.Trolleybuses don’t need expensive and inflexible guidance rails or channels  -  contrary to the deliberate misinformation still being put out by the Transport for London and the tram project team. Last year tram project manager Tim Jones persisted in trying to tell a meeting of local business people that trolleybuses need fixed guidance systems, and at the tram project exhibition last June I caught his staff telling people that trolleybuses are ‘new and untried technology’ (!).Why do the tram project staff and their supporters keep peddling such nonsense? The truth is the Mayor, other politicians and some so-called ‘professionals’, are determined to force their pet project through regardless of the obvious drawbacks, and are prepared to say anything to try to rubbish any alternative idea which might get the tram scheme stopped. And be prepared for a propaganda onslaught by tram enthusiasts who are being egged on by present and former London transport staff.If the tram scheme is built it will replace the 207 and 607 buses, but all the other buses currently running along Uxbridge Road for part of their route  -  including the E2, E3, E7, E8, E11, 70, 83, 92, 195, 260, 266, 282, 283 and 440  -   are at risk of being pushed off Uxbridge Road so they don’t get in the way of the trams, and cut back to serve as ‘feeders’ to the trams. This will disrupt the journeys of many thousands of local people who only travel on Uxbridge Road en route for a mile or two because they have to.If trolleybuses are introduced instead of trams none of this disruption will be necessary  -  trolleybuses can work with buses and other traffic  -  and the money saved could and should be used to electrify other bus services using Uxbridge Road, further improving the environment and providing a proper network of electric trolleyroutes which would benefit far more people than just one long thin tramway along Uxbridge Road.Moreover, because trolleybus systems are quick as well as cheap to build, we’ll get the benefits years before a tramway could be up and running. Trolleybuses are cheaper to operate than diesel buses as well as much more environmentally friendly, and in Europe have been found to much more attractive to passengers than buses. They’re by far the best solution for Uxbridge Road and other busy bus routes.

Chris Veasey ● 7670d45 Comments ● 6679d

Boris Johnson for Mayor??

My view is that if he is chosen he will not succeed. The London Mayoral Campaign has always been about image, and substance seems to take a back seat. It is said that Boris has a fine mind, and having read his articles on a range of subjects, including those that touch on human frailties of one sort or another, I would say that assessment is accurate. However there are the 'Gaffes', Liverpool being the biggest reciever of such things. Now our present encumbant is not without sin in the 'Gaffe' stakes either, but he gets away with it, and his hard core of support seems only to see the superficial 'cheeky chappie' image and not much else. Maybe some of them are worried about loosing their freedom passes. That was eluded to at lunchtime  on the BBC London Today by Ken, so maybe he is a tiny bit worried? However I think Ken need not worry too much, because it would take someone who can charm his hard core of support away by having the right sort of charm as Ken, but much more so, Boris does not possess that, any more than the previous candidate with an eye for the Ladies had, and he shot himself in the foot with a Jarvis Gun.Do we really need a Mayor at all? There are many who said at the time that a Greater London Authority is only going to end up as another layer of bureaurocracy, which we will have to pay for through increased Council Tax, that view could be right, but now we are stuck with it, I would hope that London could get someone who puts London First, and political ambition behind him or her, I doubt that that can ever be possible.

Colin Vaughan ● 7017d38 Comments ● 6680d

Take 30 Seconds To Make Gordon Brown Listen

Take 30 Seconds To Make Gordon Brown ListenLast Friday the people of Ireland voted to reject the Lisbon Treaty.But politicians across Europe are refusing to accept the result.  They arrogantly insist that the Treaty must go ahead anyway.  Despite the no vote, the UK Government is planning to carry on regardless, and ratify the Treaty in the House of Lords on Wednesday.This is part of an attempt to isolate and bully the people of Ireland.Please take 30 seconds to send a message to Gordon Brown by signing the petition on the Downing Street website. Tell Gordon to respect the verdict of the Irish people - and drop the Treaty.http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/Many thanks-----How politicians are refusing to listen to the no voteFrench Europe Minister Jean-Pierre Jouyet says: 'I don't think you can say the treaty of Lisbon is dead even if the ratification process will be delayed.'German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier says: 'We are sticking with our goal for it to come into force. The ratification process must continue.'Spanish Europe Minister Lopez Garrido says: 'The treaty will be applied, albeit a few months late.'European Commission President Jose Barroso says: 'The Treaty is not dead. The Treaty is alive, and we will try to work to find a solution.'British Foreign Minister David Miliband says: '18 countries have now passed the reform treaty...each country must see the ratification process to a conclusion... there needs to be a British view as well as an Irish view.'Don't let the politicians get away with it.Sign the petition now and send it to your friends.http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

Graham Weeks ● 6680d0 Comments ● 6680d

Toodle-oo

Toodle-ooMeaningA colloquial version of 'goodbye', now rather archaic. OriginThe British term 'toodle-oo' is a fellow-traveller of various terms associated with walking or departing in a carefree manner - toddle, tootle and their extended forms toddle-off and tootle-pip. Let's also not forget tootle-oo, which is a commonly heard alternative form of toodle-oo, and also its Irish variant tooraloo. Tootle is a variant of toddle, both meaning 'walk in a leisurely manner'. Toddle, which is really the base word which leads eventually to toodle-oo, is moderately old and makes an appearance in print in Allan Ramsay's The tea-table miscellany, or a collection of Scots songs, 1724:"Could na my love come todlen hame." [toddling home] The word is still with us in the term 'toddle off' which, although somewhat archaic in sound, is still commonplace in the UK at least. This was in use by the early 19th century and appears in The Dublin University Magazine, 1838:"Show this gentleman to his bedchamber, Klaus... and I'll toddle off to my library," said the Nabob.'Tootle', which also often comes complete with its 'off', has been used to mean 'walk aimlessly' since at least the early 1900s, for example, this piece from the English literary journal The Cornhill Magazine, July 1902:"I tootled down to Cooney's a half-hour before time."'Toodle-oo' sounds the kind of language that we might expect P.G. Wodehouse to indulge in, in his Jeeves and Wooster stories. Wodehouse doesn't disappoint and although he didn't originate the phrase his use of it in an early Jeeves story - Jeeves and the Hard-Boiled Egg, 1919, makes a clear link between toddling and toodling: "Ripping! I'll be toddling up, then. Toodle-oo, Bertie, old man. See you later.""Pip-pip, Bicky, dear boy."He trotted off...The first known record of toodle-oo came just a few years earlier, in a 1907 edition of Punch magazine, which was surely essential reading for the young Pelham Grenville Wodehouse, who was a contributing author to Punch at that date, and so may have written this himself:"Toodle-oo, old sport." Mr. Punch turned round at the amazing words and gazed at his companion.The mixing up of all of these terms may also have been influenced by 'toot-toot' and 'pip-pip', which were used in the early 1900s to denote the sounds of early car horns. This has lead to tootle-pip and toodle-pip, which might be imagined to be from the same period, but which are in fact late 20th century inventions in the Jeeves style. Wodehouse again had an indirect hand in this, as is shown by this piece from his 1920 novel Damsel in Distress:"Well, it's worth trying," said Reggie. "I'll give it a whirl. Toodleoo!" "Good-bye." "Pip-pip!" Reggie withdrew. Tootle-oo is first known from a date that is near enough to that of toodle-oo as to make it difficult to be certain which came first. This variant is recorded in the Letters of T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia), in 1908. The other famous Lawrence, D.H. Lawrence, is coincidentally the first known user of the Irish form tooraloo, also recorded in a letter, this time from 1921, and published in 1968 in Phoenix II:"So long! See you soon! Too-ra-loo!"Before closing, I ought to mention another commonly repeated theory on the origin of 'toodle-oo' - that tootle-oo, and by extension toodle-oo and tooraloo, derived as a slang version of the French à tout à l'heure, meaning "I'll see you soon". There's no evidence at all to support this theory, which relies entirely on the co-incidence of sound. There is also some circumstantial evidence against a French origin. Whilst the English and French nobility were closely enough mingled in the Middle Ages for the English then to have taken on many French terms verbatim, by the turn of the 20th century France had long become an unpopular rival. Very few French idioms were granted the status of a popular English slang version in the early 1900s. Just off the top, I can't think of any. It is difficult to imagine a French term being adopted as slang by the hostile and predominantly non-French speaking English populace in 1907.Finally, I suppose we ought also to deal with another derivation theory from the bottom of the pile, so to speak. This is that the word loo derives from toodle-oo, as 'too the loo'. Let's not waste bandwidth further on that one and just say, "it doesn't". Copyright © Gary Martin

Peter Wright ● 6684d0 Comments ● 6684d